Built by
Students
Designed from the student side of the table; actively shaped by real campus feedback.
Students get a verified campus app for study, chat, community, and peer connection. Your student-affairs and IT team gets a real administrator portal — with user oversight, report handling, announcement tools, and engagement analytics scoped to your university.
Built by
Students
Designed from the student side of the table; actively shaped by real campus feedback.
Adoption model
Pilot-first
We deploy with a cohort and measure before scaling to full enrollment.
Eligibility
Verified .edu only
Every account is gated by a valid institutional email on sign-up.
First-year attrition is rarely academic — it's isolation. A student who doesn't form peer connections, skips orientation, and stops engaging with campus life often withdraws before anyone catches it. Every returning first-year is $20K–$50K+ of tuition your institution keeps. Pliqd gives student-affairs a live signal of who's disengaging, and a lightweight workflow to intervene while it still matters.
Orientation modules not completed. Zero peer connections formed. No groups joined. Campus announcements consistently unread. These are the quiet signals that usually only surface at a midterm grade report. Your Pliqd dashboard surfaces them in week one.
Export the at-risk list from orientation analytics with one click. Use the pre-filled outreach template, or push a targeted campus announcement and see who actually read it. Track what worked semester over semester.
Incoming students connect with their roommates, their major, their orientation group before they step on campus. The single biggest predictor of first-year retention is whether a student forms meaningful peer connections in the first six weeks. Pliqd compresses that timeline.
The populations with the highest attrition risk are commuters and transfers — the ones who don't live in residence halls and miss the passive community-building. A campus-gated app levels the playing field: they find their people without needing to be physically present at every event.
Reports of harassment, isolation, or unsafe situations flow through the same queue your conduct office already uses. Patterns that would normally live in siloed channels — residence-life complaints, Title IX, counseling — get a single surface so your team can connect the dots.
At an institution with a 15% first-year attrition rate and 2,000 first-years, moving the needle one point back means ~20 students retained. At ~$30K tuition each, that's $600K/year to the institution's top line — before counting the housing, meal plan, and four-year lifetime value.
Honest note: we're a new platform — we haven't yet published a longitudinal retention study. That's exactly why our pilot model co-defines the metrics with you and does a joint readout at the end. If the data doesn't support the hypothesis, we tell you.
Students get a single place to study together, find classmates, share campus information, and stay connected — gated by institutional email so the community stays authentic.
Course-scoped AI tutors students (or TAs, or faculty) can create by uploading syllabi, slides, and past exams. Offloads repeat questions from tutoring centers and office hours.
Students form course-specific study groups and cross-discipline research teams, share notes, and run group chat and file exchange within the app.
A community feed where students post announcements, events, housing, and jobs — contained to the verified community, unlike open social platforms.
Connects classmates by major, year, and shared courses. Supports first-year integration, transfer onboarding, and commuter-student community building.
Text, voice notes, image, video, and PDF messaging with moderation hooks. All communication stays inside the verified community.
A consumer-facing dating/peer-matching surface is part of the student experience. Institutions can discuss cohort-level settings during pilot onboarding; we're open to institutional preferences on visibility.
Partner universities get a web portal for their student-affairs, conduct, and IT teams. Your admins see and act on data scoped to your institution only — Pliqd runs cross-university operations separately. Below is what's actually in the university admin portal today, not what's on a roadmap slide.
At-a-glance view of total users, active reports, active bans, and active groups on your campus, plus an activity chart and live report feed.
Search and filter your campus users. Issue warnings, suspend, or ban with a documented reason. Export the full list to CSV.
Student-submitted reports (harassment, spam, inappropriate content, fake profiles) flow into a triage queue. Resolve with dismiss, warn, or ban — with internal notes.
Bans can be temporary or permanent and scoped: platform-wide, Spark-only, messaging-only, groups, or events. Revocable with an audit trail.
Publish general, urgent, event, career, or Spark-related announcements. Pin, schedule expiration, and see read stats — including which students have read each one.
Create required video, quiz, form, activity, or social modules. Track completion rates, identify at-risk students, and export the list with a pre-filled outreach template.
Post part-time, full-time, internship, or contract roles with pay, hours, and deadlines. Track applicants through applied → viewed → interviewing → offer → accepted.
Review student-created groups. Verify legitimacy, mark groups as "official," or suspend. Filter by type, privacy level (public / private / secret), and status.
Active users, messages sent, Spark matches, engagement rate, and feature-level usage breakdowns — over a configurable 7 / 14 / 30 / 90-day window.
Invite additional campus admins with granular permissions: manage users, manage content, manage events, manage groups, view analytics, manage reports, invite members, manage settings. Revocable invitations.
Institutional scope: everything above is scoped to your university. Your admins don't see data from other institutions. Cross-university moderation, platform feature flags, and pricing are handled by Pliqd's platform team — kept separate by design.
We take safety seriously — both the technical controls and the human review process. The public-facing detail lives on our safety page; below is what partner institutions ask about most.
Every account is verified against an institutional email on sign-up. No .edu, no account.
Students report users, messages, and posts by type (harassment, spam, inappropriate, fake profile, other). Reports land in your admin queue filtered by status: pending, investigating, resolved, dismissed.
From a report, your admins can issue a warning (with severity and acknowledgment tracking), suspend, or ban — with ban scope limited to platform, Spark, messaging, groups, or events. All actions audited.
Pliqd's platform operators keep a cross-university safety console — so critical issues with platform-wide reach (coordinated abuse, CSAM, legal requests) get handled centrally and routed to the right university.
Students control who can contact them. Blocked users are mutually invisible across feed, chat, and matching surfaces.
Date-of-birth gating and feature restrictions for users under 18. Dating features are unavailable to underage accounts.
We'd rather tell you where we are than oversell a compliance badge. Full privacy policy is here; this is the procurement-office summary.
We collect what's needed to run the product — name, institutional email, date of birth, and the content students create. We don't ingest institutional SIS data.
Accounts belong to the student, not the institution. Students can export or delete their account and content at any time via in-app controls.
Infrastructure on major US cloud providers. TLS in transit, encryption at rest for backend storage. Authentication tokens stored in device secure storage / keychain.
Pliqd is a student-facing consumer service — not a school official under FERPA in the typical sense — but we handle student records in line with FERPA principles: data minimization, transparency, student consent, and the right to delete. Happy to walk institutional counsel through specifics.
Today we verify identity via institutional email. Full SAML / OIDC SSO against campus IdPs (Okta, Azure AD, Shibboleth) is a roadmap item we prioritize for partners with that requirement.
We do not yet hold a SOC 2 Type II report. We can share our current security controls document under NDA and prioritize attestation for institutional partners.
We're not going to claim retention lift in a brochure. What we will do is co-define measurable outcomes with a pilot cohort and report back honestly — whether the data supports the hypothesis or not.
Hypothesis
Does peer-to-peer connection pre-arrival reduce first-year isolation and flight risk?
Hypothesis
Do AI study bots reduce load on tutoring centers while improving gateway-course outcomes?
Hypothesis
Does a verified campus-only feed reduce student reliance on anonymous / unmoderated platforms?
Hypothesis
Does in-app study-group formation drive meaningful increases in collaborative study hours?
45-minute call with student-affairs / IT leadership. We walk through the product, security posture, and outcome hypotheses. Honest on gaps.
We roll out to a defined cohort (e.g. a residence hall, a first-year class, a specific college) with agreed success metrics upfront.
At the end of the pilot we share what worked and what didn't. Scale, adjust, or part ways — your call, no lock-in.
Yes. The core student experience is free. Premium features exist on a consumer-subscription basis, similar to other consumer apps.
Pilots are currently offered at no cost. Institutional partners get access to the admin portal described above — user oversight, report handling, announcement tooling, orientation modules, jobs board, engagement analytics — at pilot pricing. Post-pilot commercial terms are set transparently based on what we build together; we'll share our current pricing sheet on request rather than publish a placeholder tier on this page.
No. Pliqd is opt-in. Students choose to sign up, and they control their account and data. Institutions can recommend but not mandate enrollment.
The same data a student-conduct office would reasonably need to investigate a report: the user list for your campus, the reports filed against users, message context inside a report, and orientation-completion status. Your admins do not see private DMs outside a report, swipe history, or Spark activity. They do not see any data from other institutions. Platform-wide moderation sits with Pliqd, not with any single university.
Spark is a peer-matching surface restricted to 18+ verified students. It's opt-in at the user level. We're open to discussing cohort-level visibility controls during pilot design if that matters for your institution.
Pliqd is new. We're in early pilots and not going to claim a reference list we don't have — we'd rather earn it. If that's a dealbreaker for your institution, we completely understand; if not, we'd love to talk.
We'll share our security controls document, roadmap, and pilot framework on request. Real answers, no gated webinar.